Project management, product management, delivery management, release management, iteration management, whatever title is used, it’s often too complicated. For anyone working across the spectrum of delivery - product, service, technical or non - the work we do, the challenges we face, the changes we have to drive, are complex enough on their own. A plethora of methods, frameworks and tooling often only add to the complexity, yet they are relied upon for order, discipline, and structured delivery of organizational initiatives. I would be the first to caution against oversimplifying the practice of project delivery. It is not simple, but anything that makes the experience much more difficult than it needs to be, warrants careful consideration.
For some time now, I’ve had this picture forming in my mind. At first, it was just a cacophony of images that represented thoughts and insights on my experiences in project management. As a visual and reading/writing type of learner, I often try to visualize my musings and solutions while scribbling various notes on whatever medium is handy. It took a while, years actually, but the meaning did emerge and this summer, I decided it was time to formalize. A brave illustrator took a rough storyboard emerging in my mind and created this illustration. It depicts what project management often feels like these days - a perplexing Rube Goldberg with stages and steps that frustrate and often don’t make sense.
I often wonder how many project management methodologies or frameworks now exist? I’ve lost track. In an article written by Steve Denning, there is an eye-opening graphic that depicts how many variants of “Agile” are out there now - about 40. Add to that all of the more traditional project management methods embodied in PMBoK, PRINCE2, IPMA ICB, international and national standards, and the tooling available, I feel it prudent to reiterate what others have said before but seems to often fall on deaf ears. When it comes to success in project delivery, the methods don’t seem to matter.
Methods, frameworks, philosophies and tools emerge and evolve; they form part of the support system for success but they aren’t the real drivers of success. The basic foundations of success start and end with people. Influencing, motivating, and guiding them. Unleashing the power, creativity, and capability only people can provide. The processes and systems are there to support them, but the focus has to be people-centered.
When you understand what drives people, you understand and tap into the age-old secrets of success and not just in project delivery, but in many other aspects of life. I’ve witnessed different dimensions and incarnations of these foundational drivers, foundational because they serve as a base to build upon. In and of themselves I doubt they would fully yield the outcomes expected, but without them, I know for certain you’ll have a hot mess. Rather than trying to expound on them all at once, I’ve attempted to pinpoint the three drivers that have proved the most impactful over the course of my experience leading projects. They served as guiding principles, reliable in every situation: simplicity, ingenuity, and accountability.
If any of this resonates and you’re interested in learning more, be sure to look for Part II of the #backtobasics series, where I start to delve into each of these areas. Thanks!
